1 Nov ASTM A – Designation: A – 05 Standard Speci?cation for Chemical Passivation Treatment. 1 Sep Designation: A — 05€* This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 Provided by IMS under license with ASTM. Advanced Plating Technologies, a Milwaukee, Wisconsin company, is an industry leading provider of passivation of stainless steel to ASTM A, AMS
|Published (Last):||17 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||2.67 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The 3 consensus specifications used at this time, and that should be used for all specifications of passivation are:. The “right” spec is the one that your customer requires.
ASTM A Passivation Standards | Passivated Stainless Steel Parts
It was cancelled in early in favor a967-055 AMS Lee Kremer Stellar Solutions, Inc. Do the parameters in A cover any worst case scenario? In simple terms, he’s saying that given 2 SS surfaces which have different concentrations of free iron, the chemical reaction will take longer in the surface with more free iron. Lee Kremer has pointed out that A is not a Specification, only a Practice. Ray, Thank you for answering. Stainless steel passivation performed to the ASTM A standards meets these standards by passing tests that confirm its effectiveness, particularly as it pertains to removing free iron ashm the cold-worked surfaces.
AMS [link by ed.
My customer wants to put A on his print q967-05 standard passivation, but my plater tells me that he passivates to A AMS exempts C from testing.
These tests include the following practices: As far as the stainless steel passivation process itself, you’re pretty much always going to work your way back to A Hello, While carrying out passivation tests we came across the following apparent contrast.
ASTM A – 05 Standard Specification for Chemical Passivation Treatments for Stainless Steel Parts
Chemical passivation removes free iron and other surface contaminants from stainless steel parts, improving corrosion resistance. Regards, Ted Mooney, P. The ASTM provides instructions and acceptance criteria for these and other tests that can verify the quality aztm a stainless steel passivation operation. In reading through the specification I believe the drawing is incorrect. Thank you for your hard work which the finishing world continues to benefit from.
Always specify exactly what you want– e. Is there any clear direction or is it optional? We design our own parts, and do our own passivation in house, and hence prefer the testing requirements awtm ASTM A What is standard to you may not be standard to them.
ASTM A967 vs. AMS 2700? Which is the right passivation spec?
Which is the right passivation spec? A renumbers those to 1 through 4 there is no such thing as A Type 6 or 7 a9667-05 restores the missing four for a total of eight Types. He passed away May 14, Indeed also my conclusion is that it is an omission.
July 6, A. Both contain a carryover of QQ-PC with the addition of the more recently developed citric acid based process. It’s not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages.
Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. But again, please describe your situation. A is a standard covering treatments to passivate stainless steel regardless of what it will be used for and then test methods to show that it was passivated.