Brown, Gillian. Discourse analysis – (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). 1. Discourse analysis. 1. Title in. Yule, George. P ISBN O 8 hard. 1 Nov Ton Weyters; Gillian Brown and George Yule, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Full text of “Discourse Analysis By Gillian Brown & George Yule” Publication Data Brown, Gillian Discourse analysis – (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics) 1.
|Published (Last):||8 April 2006|
|PDF File Size:||14.95 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
No direct comparison is intended, since the two pieces of discourse were produced in strictly non-comparable circumstances for very different anaalysis poses. Though it may not be common knowledge that the speaker has an uncle, it is what Grice My cat has just been sick again.
We all believe that it is the faculty of language which has enabled the human race to develop diverse cultures, each with its distinctive social customs, religious observances, laws, oral traditions, patterns of trading, and so on. It must be clear that the spatial location identified by here in each of these expressions could be interpreted as a series of concentric rings spreading out from anqlysis speaker and encompassing different amounts of physical space, but the interpretation of the spatial range of the expression here on any particular occasion of use will have to be sought in the context of what the speaker is talking about.
It must be clear however, that a printed version of a handwritten text is, in an important sense, an interpretation.
Discourse Analysis by Gillian Brown
This aspect of communication is obviously what written language is supremely good at, whether for the benefit of the individual in remembering the private paraphernalia of daily life, or for the benefit of nations in establishing constitutions, laws and treaties with other nations. Sophia Loren, the film actress, awoke in a prison cell in Caserta, near Naples, today.
Thus a woman on a bus describing the way a mutual friend has been gillina, getting out of bed too soon after an operation, concludes her turn in the conversation by saying: Get access Buy the print book. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. From the descriptive work of a number of scholars studying spoken language e. Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation’s collection.
It seems fair to suggest that discourse analysis of spoken language is particularly prone to over-analysis. The speaker has available to him the full range of ‘voice quality’ e ffects as well as facial expression, postural geeorge gestural systems.
Working from this data, the analyst seeks to describe regularities in the linguistic realisations used by people to communicate those meanings and intentions.
Analysis of conversational organization in Indonesian doctor—patient diagnostic talks. Avoid obscurity of expression. Are there general principles to appeal to? Consider the following lexical items in a number of verbal contexts cited almost at random from Darwin’s Journal during the Voyage of HMS Beagle round the World: The addressor is the speaker or writer who produces the utterance.
Gillian Brown and George Yule, Discourse Analysis | Reviewed by István Kenesei
Evening News Edinburgh22 April d Whereas written language sentences are generally struc- tured in subject-predicate form, in spoken discokrse it is 16 1. Ought we not rather to think in terms of partially intersecting views of context? Within the co-text, as we have seen in 17 above, a further context may be constructed which has its own index of co- ordinates. He has to determine what constitutes the verbal event, and what form he will transcribe it in.
My uncle is coming home from Canada. Analysiz out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. John, one of the group, has just told a joke.
The notion of assumed ‘common ground’ is also involved in such a characterisation of presupposition and can be found in this definition by Stalnaker Gillina the following conversational fragment, we shall say, for example, that speaker A uses the expressions ciscourse uncle and he to refer to one individual and my mother’s sister and she to refer to another. There are conventional implica- tures which are, according to Grice, determined by ‘the conven- tional meaning of the words used’ In general th e discou rse analyst wor ks yuule a tape- recordinjgofan ev ent, from w hich he t hen makes a written transcrip tionannotated a ccording to his interests on a particular occasion – transcriptions of the sort which will appear in this book.
It is relevant that the time at which this text appeared was in the late s. He describes the latter in the following way: Presupposition as investigator certainty in a police interrogation: Since the analyst has only limited access to what a speaker intended, or how sincerely he was behaving, in the production of a discourse fragment, browj claims regarding the implicatures identified will have the status of interpretations.
Hymes views the role of context in interpretation as, on the one hand, limiting the range of possible interpretations and, on the other, as supporting the intended interpretation: Communication Methods and Measures, Vol. There will be unfortun- ate even disastrous consequences in the real world if the message is not properly understood by the recipient.
Discourse analysis is a term that has come to have different interpretations for scholars working in different disciplines. That is to say, even if there were an agreed, standard system for tagging utterances with spatio-temporal features, there is no guarantee that that tagging system provides the relevant informa- tion. This behaviour is consistent with Hymes’ own expecta- tions about how his framework would be used.
The speaker continues with a change of location and we have to assume that what follows is within the newly introduced location: International Journal of Listening, p.
Please pass the marmalade.